Wounds of Honour (Empire), by Anthony Riches
It is always with a sense of trepidation that one approaches a new author in the field of historical fiction. When it is a genre awash with heavy-hitters like Bernard Cornwell, Conn Iggulden and Wilbur Smith there is always a sense of what is almost sympathy with the newcomer. As a reader you are hoping against hope that this new author will pass muster and be good enough to compete with these long standing names. You want the novel to be entertaining, captivating and give a real sense of the period. Especially when you consider the various periods that have been covered by the heavyweights of the genre, there are some seriously tough acts to follow.
Fortunately Riches does not disappoint. Set during the reign of Emperor Commodus, the action of this debut novel is based in the contested region around Hadrian’s Wall, ever plagued by war. Unruly tribes from the North are counterpointed by the ever present threat of uprising from the Britons living South of the wall. The Roman legions present are having to balance these various dangers as well as the difficulties of defending such a vast area of land with relatively few men.
The main protagonist is a young Roman sent to the end of the Empire, initially to join one of the front line legions. However the carefully woven plot soon pulls young Marcus Valerius Aquila away from his intended path – throwing him unbidden into a tale of conspiracy, murder and greed. Riches manages to succeed in drawing the plots and intrigue of Rome herself across the Empire to disrupt and destroy the lives of both good Romans and the Britons who serve them.
Marcus’ character is well supported by the allies he meets along the way, creating for us not only a believable persona but also a core of central ‘cast’ members for whom the reader soon develops real affection, or antipathy depending how Riches weaves the narrative. The confrontation and battle scenes reflect the brutal violence of the age, and succeed in emphasising to us just how short and bloody life in AD 182 could turn out to be. The evident historical knowledge of the period only ever enriches it, and never weighs down the reader’s enjoyment.
This is where Wounds of Honour really succeeds. By the mid-point of the book there is a real momentum building up, and I found myself rooting for Marcus and his companions while generating real anger against those that make their best efforts to undermine or kill him. The best way I can communicate just how captivating the novel is would be to recount how the arrival home of my girlfriend passed unnoticed for fifteen minutes by me, knee-deep in the mud and blood of Roman Britain. It was only after a pointed cough and “hello” that I managed to drag myself back to reality.
Whilst this may not be the ideal advert, it certainly exemplifies how enthralling this work of fiction turns out to be. As a reader who has a passion for historic fiction of any era, and has read the Emperor series by Iggulden, I was more than pleasantly surprised at the quality of this newcomer to the scene.
If I had to level a criticism at Riches’ work, it would be that in the early stages there is a level of confusion to the plot, largely due to the similarities between various Roman names and the fast moving nature of the story. Fortunately this unavoidable difficulty is soon overcome as the twists and turns reveal themselves, breaking any misgivings like barbarians against a shield wall.
So how does one summarise this new entrant into the world of historical fiction? Capable, believable, exciting. Enthralling. Intriguing. Although it is a rarity to pour such praise onto a volume, in the case of Wounds of Honour this reviewer was more than a little impressed. The most significant cause for annoyance is that the second volume in the series is not released until April 2010, leaving me with an awfully long time to wait before I discover where Marcus’ tale will travel next.
Cornwell, Iggulden, Smith – Beware. There is a new power on the rise.












Literature News 24/7


One Comment on Wounds of Honour (Empire), by Anthony Riches
Am I the only one wondering whose idea came first – that of Conn Iggulden, or that of Anthony Riches?
I say this because, after having read all four books in Iggulden’s Emperor series, I was very surprised, last Saturday, to see what I thought was a fifth one in a bookshop: the word “Empire” looks almost identical to “Emperor” on Iggulden’s four books, and the subtitle (“Wounds of Honour”) closely resembles those of Iggulden’s series (“The Gates of Rome”, “The Death of Kings”, and so on). Also, the picture of the eagle emblem was, at first glance, the same as that on Iggulden’s books. However, when I read the information inside, I learned that this was not a fifth book in the series, but the author’s first book; and when I then looked more closely at the cover, I realised that the author was not the same as that of the series I had read (I had suffered a momentary memory lapse as far as Iggulden’s name was concerned). I bought the book nonetheless, because its theme is right up my alley. Back home, I compared it to the Iggulden series, and that was when I realised that this was “Empire”, not “Emperor”.
I couldn’t help wondering, though, whether one of the two authors got the idea from the other. Does anyone have information about this? – I am merely curious.
Let us know your thoughts below